Ivor Greymantle
Editor in Chief
Ivor Greymantle is publisher and editor-in-chief of Greymantle’s Politics and Culture and primary administrator of the website. He is a U.S.-based financial analyst specializing in multi-lateral lending institutions, hospitals, and U.S. state and local governments with 24 years of experience. Prior to entering the financial industry, Greymantle worked in public relations, film production, and for a medical not-for-profit.
Greymantle holds an MBA in Economics and Management from the Leonard Stern School of Business at New York University and a BA in Psychology from the University of Pennsylvania. He has served on the boards of two 501(c)3 organizations in the greater New York City region.
Ivor Greymantle is a pen name chosen for the sake of anonymity to keep the author’s professional, private and journalistic lives as separate and independent realms. His articles for the site have focused on geopolitics, economic and political forecasting and cultural change as gauged through the works of popular culture.
If the New Hollywood of the 1970s opened the door to morally ambiguous heroes, 21st century prestige television ripped that door off its hinges. A rapid evolution towards darker protagonists of the inverted hero type explains much about how America learned to love the bad guys.
The 21st century American film protagonist doesn’t need to be decent. He or she needs only to be effective. The assassin earns admiration because she is the finest assassin in the world. The criminal mastermind commands respect because he outwits everyone around him. This paradox defines the shift from tragic antiheroes to inverted heroes in film since the late 1990s.
In the span of 60 years, America’s movie heroes have undergone a transformation. Characters who would once have served as villains now occupy the moral center. Something fundamental has changed—not simply in Hollywood, but in the relationship between American audiences and the characters they choose to embrace. In 21st century U.S. films, good guys were black.
In this third and final part of our 3-part series "Understanding Cryptocurrency", we delve into the deepening connections between the crypto industry and America's populist right-wing, examine the mainstreaming of crypto starting in the late 2010s, and venture some predictions about the future of crypto.
The growth of Bitcoin revealed an important truth about cryptocurrency: blockchain technology had been created to solve a technical problem, but enthusiasm surrounding Bitcoin was never solely about technology. For some supporters, Bitcoin was an act of protest against centralized financial institutions. For others, it was an opportunity to become rich. Competing motivations helped fuel the explosive growth of crypto in the 2010s and are essential to understanding cryptocurrency.
More than 17 years after Bitcoin’s creation, cryptocurrency remains one of the most poorly understood phenomena in modern finance and technology. Part of the confusion stems from the fact that three distinct concepts have become tangled together in the public's mind under the name "crypto". In this series, we untangle these concepts. In Part 1, we explore the Blockchain Revolution that made cryptocurrencies possible.
Elite discourse in the West tends to dwell rhapsodically on the supposed joys of autonomy and self-fulfillment. What it spends less time analyzing is the loneliness of modern freedom. It can advocate for why autonomy allows for liberation. What it can't explain is why autonomy has not delivered happiness. This week, we consider 'The Loneliness of Modern Freedom'.
By recentering the Catholic Church on its foundational truths and prioritizing administrative integrity, Pope Leo XIV is attempting to heal internal Church fissures that many thought were beyond repair, while serving as a rare anchor in a world that has lost its moorings. In his first year, Pope Leo seems to have made all the right moves.
In November 2024, days before Donald Trump’s improbable reelection, I published an article on these pages titled "Lord of Illusions: Donald Trump as Master Magician". Trump's behavior, I alleged, bore a close resemblance to that of the infamous Aleister Crowley. The "Illusionist" that I described in 2024 has fully manifested himself as “the Chaos Magick President" of 2026. The stage tricks are gone; what remains is a raw, blasphemous attempt to overwrite the firmware of reality.
Back in March, I made a very bullish forecast that Iran's regime would collapse with 98% certainty for myriad reasons, the U.S.-Israeli attacks being the most proximate. But I was dead wrong. In this post, I analyze the gaps and mistakes made in my earlier forecast. What does humble pie taste like? Read on and I'll tell you.
The geostrategic thinking of President Trump's inner circle revolves around a stark premise: the U.S. is entering a period of geopolitical rivalry that will culminate in a military confrontation with China. Since that confrontation is coming quickly, Washington cannot afford to remain entangled in a half-dozen smaller regional conflicts. Their solution is brutally simple: Before the larger struggle begins, the U.S. should neutralize as many secondary adversaries as possible.
We argued in last Saturday's post that Iran’s Islamic regime faces imminent collapse. Some readers have pushed back -- fair enough. Predictions about regime collapse should always be treated with skepticism. But the situation unfolding in Iran right now is unusually bleak for the ruling clerical establishment. The regime is far more fragile than many observers realize. In this post, we outline 10 reasons why Iran's regime will fall.
On February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched what is now unmistakably a war against the Islamic Republic of Iran. The initial wave of airstrikes, cyber operations, and follow-on attacks were not symbolic gestures or calibrated signals meant to restore “deterrence.” They were systematic blows against Iran’s military infrastructure, missile forces, and the remaining skeleton of its nuclear program.
Some readers of last weekend's post complained about its length. To answer those criticisms and better serve our readers, we here revisit the topic of love and doom in Westeros. At just over 1,200 words, it's a 7-minute read. Enjoy!
Romantic love in Westeros is a dangerous thing — more likely to topple dynasties than to secure happily-ever-after endings. George R.R. Martin, unlike most contemporary authors, seems unusually committed to proving his point. Yet by universalizing the pathological dimensions of eros and marginalizing love’s potential to ennoble, Martin presents a vision that can feel sharply, and often cruelly, limited. Hence the title of this week's post: The Anti-Romantic: George R.R. Martin's Tragic Vision of Love'.
Over the past 18 months, Greymantle’s Politics and Culture has grown into something more significant than we originally imagined, thanks to your engagement. As we scope out the next 18 months of our editorial calendar, we’ve been looking closely at the data. We want to know if the numbers tell the same story that you would. Today, we'd like to ask for your help in Shaping the Mantle -- so to speak.
Why do so many Americans believe their government is controlled by hidden cabals? One possible answer: it's what Hollywood has conditioned them to believe by producing TV shows like Blindspot, Mr. Robot, and The Blacklist. Learn how the unexpected success of The X-Files in the 1990s turbocharged three decades of 'paranoid entertainment'.
When Greymantle published its Dec. 2024 forecast for Trump 2.0, we sketched three broad trajectories or pathways that Trump 2.0 could take, with Pathway Two being the Orban model. A full year into Donald Trump's second term as President, the gravitational pull toward Pathway Two - the illiberal consolidation of power through institutional redesign and policy overreach - is unmistakable.
There is something faintly strange—and genuinely wonderful—about the fact that in a decade as anxious, polarized, and often joyless as the 2020s, a large and culturally diverse audience could rally around a television series so unapologetically steeped in pop-culture excess. Stranger Things is cinematic realization of the 1960s pop ditty 'The Monster Mash' -- a wild ride through American genre films with monsters as fellow passengers.
Our forecast for 2026 is a gloomy one. We title it ‘Calculus of Fear’ because our baseline view is that the coming year will be defined by the cold calculations of several key actors whose intention will be to intimidate strategic antagonists and domestic opponents alike, rewrite global norms, defy multilateral institutions, and carve the world up into spheres of influence.
Twelve months ago, Greymantle published a 2025 outlook that attempted to map a world drifting toward instability, illusion, and overconfidence. Some of those calls landed squarely on target. Others missed. A few arrived in that territory analysts prefer not to linger in—the grey zone, where you are directionally right, tactically wrong, and forced to explain yourself. This year-in-review does exactly that.
Guillermo del Toro's film adaptation of 'Frankenstein' succeeds by sticking to the original novel's metaphysical concerns, even as it audaciously revises a number of key plot points. By simultaneously reaching back to the West's religious past and forward into a future impacted by artificial intelligence, Del Toro manages to be both faithful to - and to transcend - Mary Shelley's famed horror novel.
Dancing, particularly among young people, has been a dying social form since at least the 1970s. But the slow death of dance in America is not the result of changing musical tastes – though those have also played a role -- but a more profound indicator of cultural disintegration. In this week's post we explore why America stopped dancing: The Four Critical Forces that Killed Social Ritual.
Part 3 of our ongoing series on imaginative failures focuses on Democratic Party leaders and activists in the lead-up to the 2024 U.S. general election. We analyze their failure of sympathetic imagination for the American voter, whose characteristics had changed significantly since 2016 and 2020 due to social distrust stemming from the pandemic and online culture.
U.S. Democratic Party candidates had what pundits rightly described as 'a very good night' on November 4, racking up major electoral victories in NJ, VA, NYC and elsewhere. In this post, we provide a high-level analysis of eight key factors that bolstered Democratic fortunes in the off-year elections including continued cost of living pressures and growing concerns about H.R. 1 linked Medicaid cuts scheduled for January.
An electoral victory by Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani in the New York City mayor's race is likely to stir an over-the-top policy response by the Trump Administration including, but not limited to, placing the Big Apple under martial law.
We are living through a combustible moment in U.S. history, and the combination of a revolutionary New York City mayor and an authoritarian-leaning U.S. President may prove the most combustible mixture of all. Hence the title of today's post, "A Vote for Mamdani Is a Vote for Martial Law".
Vladimir Putin once sold himself as the master strategist who rebuilt Russia. In September 2025, the mask slipped. His armies stalled, his economy cracked, NATO didn’t blink, and Donald Trump called him a “paper tiger.” Dead Man Walking; Vladimir Putin's September of Setbacks traces the month the myth began to die
Iran’s June 2025 war with Israel and two years of Israeli dueling with its proxy network have left Iran’s defensive capabilities and internal situation severely compromised. The Iranian regime’s prospects for survival run through Caracas. Venezuela supplies Tehran with drugs-for-cash pipelines, gold swaps, drone hubs, and safehouses for regime members. This post explores why Venezuela is the indispensable backstop for the battered Iranian regime. Hence our title, "Iran's Venezuelan Lifeline".
Hamas clearly miscalculated. Two years into the Gaza War, Israel has fought harder, longer, and wider than Hamas ever imagined. Rockets spent, tunnels exposed, allies struck, and political campaigns abroad failing — Hamas is weaker than at any time in its history. Israel may achieve the one outcome few believed possible: a decisive military victory. But even a crushing battlefield defeat is unlikely to end Hamas as an idea. This week's post is: "Hamas's Last Stand? Five Factors Supporting an Israeli Victory'.
What we witnessed last week in Minneapolis was not an isolated tragedy, nor the random work of a single unhinged individual. The ideology of nihilism, the lure of online fantasy, and the predatory nature of occult-inspired networks like 764 and their predecessors form a toxic ecosystem that breeds violence. We examine this ecosystem in today's post: "Chaos is the Goal: The Minneapolis Church Shooter and the Aims of Esoterrorism".
Recently, Greymantle's editor-in-chief sat down with contributor Richard Jupa, lead writer of our multipart 'China-Taiwan' series, to talk about tensions in the Taiwan Straits and how China might approach taking back the island nation that it regards as a renegade province. A transcript of our interview constitutes this week's post, which we are calling: "The Dragon versus The Hedgehog".
Birth rates have been falling across the industrialized world for five generations, but the fertility decline has lately become a true fertility crisis. From France, to Russia, to South Korea to the U.S., cultural fixes and government incentives won’t be enough to turn the tide. In 'Breaking the Wheel of Flesh' Greymantle argues that reproductive technologies are the tools to which high income societies will turn —yet these tools remain far from ready to address the crisis on the broad, society-wide scale needed.
The Gaza War remains trapped in strategic limbo, haunted by two unanswerable questions: Can Hamas survive and still claim victory, even if that victory results in the starvation of their own people? Can Israel win and retain a semblance of humanity? In this new post, “The Gaza War Revisited”, Greymantle explores how both sides have become prisoners of their own ideologies—unable to retreat, yet unable to prevail.
The American public appears to have relegated COVID-19 to the realm of an endemic nuisance rather than an existential threat. Yet the quiet summer surge of 2025 serves as more than a seasonal blip. It is a stark reminder that despite the painful lessons learned during the initial, devastating COVID-19 outbreak, the United States remains unprepared for another pandemic. This week's post focuses on "Unlearned Lessons: America's Precarious Post-Pandemic Stance".
For a stretch of time in the late 2010s and early 2020s, it seemed as though a particular ideological current was not merely ascendant, but had achieved something akin to cultural inevitability. Its proponents, buoyed by institutional capture and a vocal online presence, carried themselves with the conviction of history's ultimate victors. Yet even the most seemingly unstoppable force can find its momentum checked. Such is the subject of this week's post: "They Thought They Owned the Future: Wokism in Eclipse."
The West's cultural landscape has become fragmented - far beyond mere polarization - with the right, left, and center engaged in a profound ongoing conflict. This week's post delves into the prescient insights of an obscure American sociologist who, almost 60 years ago, accurately predicted many features of our time. Discover his remarkable foresight in "He Saw It Coming: Remembering Philip Rieff, Prophet of Anti-Culture".
The recent Israeli and U.S. military strikes against Iran’s nuclear program have been described in the press as “crippling” and “unprecedented". But such language misses the real story. These strikes were not an end point. They were a transition from deterrence and into something more volatile, subversive, and potentially regime-breaking. The final phase of the war is beginning. The question is: Can the regime can survive until autumn?
America has always been a pluralistic society. From its earliest beginnings as a distinct nation, the country has been shaped by waves of migration, religious dissent, linguistic variety and an uneasy, albeit fruitful, coexistence. And yet, one could be forgiven for thinking that multiculturalism is a recent ideological invention. This is no accident. The word and the concept have become subject to the distortions of America's political polarization. It's time to liberate the word from the culture war. Our subject today is America's two multiculturalisms.
Over the past four decades, Satanic aesthetics and occult-infused posturing have crept steadily from the margins of Western subcultures into the mainstream of fashion, music, film, and avant-garde performance.Today, one can see an ornate Baphomet choker in the front row at Paris Fashion Week, or a Luciferian ode embedded in a high-budget pop video.This isn't just shock for commerce's sake. Beneath the spectacle lies a sensibility with deeper cultural roots and emerging ideological heft.We have dubbed this phenomenon 'The Sinisterian Impulse'.
In a period marked by rapid technological transformation, social atomization, and the weakening of institutional religion, the exorcism film functions like a dark mirror held up to the viewer’s own unease. Even those who profess no religious belief are susceptible to the primal fear these films awaken—the idea that one's mind, body, or loved ones could be seized by something invisible, incomprehensible and malevolent. In this post, we shed some light on what the surge in exorcism movies says about America.
In a society awash with slogans, the term "Wokism" has emerged as one of the slipperier entries in the contemporary political lexicon. For some, it represents an overdue moral awakening to the injustices baked into American life. For others, it signals the rise of a new orthodoxy—cloaked in compassion, fluent in the language of rights and inclusion, but with the instincts of a revolutionary vanguard. The subject of this week's post is understanding Wokism.
For America’s liberals and centrists, the return of Donald Trump to the White House has inspired a mix of alarm, exhaustion, and grim resignation. The second Trump administration, like the first, offers a governance style heavy on grievance and light on guardrails. But beneath the chaos, a profound shift is occurring. Conservative populism represents a sharp break from the elite consensus. This post examines seven areas where the "Trumpian policy outlook" may offer unexpected upsides - silver linings among the dark clouds.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has long been adept at navigating crises both foreign and domestic, but Russia’s three-year war against Ukraine and its domestic fallout are testing his ability to manage Russia’s internal factions like never before. The difference between prior periods of internal unrest and Putin's present challenges lie in the pain felt by ordinary Russians and the multiple sources of pressure weighing on the Kremlin's elite factions, all of which Putin must manage.
Sir James Goldsmith was many things: a financier, a corporate raider, a political agitator, and—perhaps most importantly—a thinker ahead of his time. In the 1970s and 1980s, he made a name for himself as a bold and often ruthless investor, orchestrating high-profile takeovers and amassing a fortune in the process. But by the 1990s, Goldsmith had shifted his focus away from wealth accumulation to something he saw as far more consequential: warning of the dangers of globalization and a coming populist revolt.
The Islamic Republic of Iran is nearing its endgame. After 45 years of enforced religious conformity, wars against neighbors, and the sponsoring of international terrorism against Israel and the U.S., the regime founded by Ayatollah Khomeini is on its last legs. Here is the essence of the endgame: 5 reasons Iran's regime will fall in 2025.
Forecasting events used to be something that I did casually - almost like a hobby. But years of being more right than wrong in my predictions convinced me to start this blog with a small group of collaborators. That's its purpose now - to analyse, to predict, and, hopefully, to give people a clearer view of the forces shaping our world. That's why we write this blog.
As dissatisfaction with both major parties grows, the same question keeps arising: Could a U.S. third party finally scale up into a viable national force? To succeed, a third party would need to capture about one-quarter of the U.S. electorate across more than half the states. To do that, third parties first need to identify the voter groups ready to defect from the two major parties - they need to go looking for the "purple" people.
In today's post, we veer sharply away from the geopolitical to delve, if ever so briefly, into the deeply personal. Why we write this blog is a tale of a lifelong obsession with forecasts and predictions. Having been eerily correct in foreseeing several critical events, when almost no one else did, convinced us that transforming our forecasting obsession into regular, public exercise was worth a shot.
Biden’s political career is a case study in the dangers of reactive sentimentality. From his early years in politics, when his personal animus toward Richard Nixon drove his political decisions, to his handling of the Bork and Thomas confirmation hearings, Biden’s political choices have been driven more by emotion than by reasoned analysis.
As we enter 2025, the global landscape is poised for a number of transformative events. The beginning of an economic bubble in the U.S. under the second Trump administration, the likely overthrow of the Iranian regime, and a negotiated armistice to the Russia-Ukraine War are just a few developments with the power to upend global power dynamics. Hence our 2025 Forecast: Resetting the Global Chessboard.
At the start of 2024, Greymantle made 12 major predictions for the year. Ten of them turned out to be correct, an 83% success rate. The really interesting outcomes are the two we got wrong: the reelection of Donald Trump, and Bibi Netanyahu's ability to beat all odds.
In sketching out the three possible paths the incoming Trump administration could take, we must focus first on the incoming president himself. We believe Trump's attitude toward the highest office has changed. It's going to be a case of 'No More Mr. Nice Guy: three possible paths for a second Trump administration'.
Despite being under investigation for corruption and leading a government engaged in an existential war for Israel's survival, Benjamin Netanyahu has never held a stronger hand in his 30-plus years in politics. Israel's military campaign has featured a relentless series of targeted assassinations, resembling Michael Corleone’s methodical settling of scores in the The Godfather saga. The collapse of Syria's autocratic government strengthens Bibi's hand even further. This is truly Bibi's Michael Corleone moment.
Elections are decided not only by the mistakes made by the losing candidate, but by the strategically shrewd decisions made by the winning candidate. Donald Trump's advisors made several astute calls that helped to neutralize Trump's weaknesses as a candidate, but it was Trump's own resilience, relentlessness, and refusal to back down above all else that cemented his victory.
The dust of the November 5 election is still settling, but based on what we know, seven reasons stand out for why Kamala Harris lost the 2024 election. A mood of anti-incumbency, a late start to the campaign, and Harris's failure to connect with voters are the top three.
Greymantle anticipates that a Harris victory will be supported by five key trends playing out in the swing states: lingering female anger over Roe v. Wade's overturning, the unreliability of young male voters, Trump's refusal to triangulate and tone down his rhetoric, and fewer senior citizen supporters than in 2020.
In this fourth and final post covering the four major-party candidates for President and VP in the 2024 U.S. election, we are going to frame Donald Trump's candidacy in an unusual way: as the performance of a master magician. A magician, in the sense that Trump resembles, more than anything else, an extraordinarily effective stage or ceremonial magician.
Tim Walz has the right background for a national office seeker. He served in the National Guard, was a high school teacher and coach, and is Governor of Minnesota. He also has a down to earth manner of speaking that should be connecting with voters. The question is: Does any of this matter in a toxic political environment? Hence our title - The Coach: Tim Walz and the Risks of 'Common Man Progressivism'.
There is no doubt that Tim Walz lost Tuesday night's debate against his GOP opponent, J.D. Vance. Walz stumbled badly as the result of not understanding the nature of American populism. The people are fed up with the 'expert class' and tired of receiving evasive answers in response to simple and direct questions.
J.D. Vance's rise from Appalachian poverty to the heights of U.S. politics is a testament to the complexity of his personal journey and the ambition that has characterized his adult life. The calculated moves Vance has made since he left Yale Law School behind reveal a more defining characteristic: a relentless drive to climb the social ladder, at all costs. Hence our title - The Climber: J.D. Vance and the Slippery Pole of Social Ascendancy.
Vice President Kamala Harris and her campaign stand at a dramatic crossroads. Her candidacy represents a dramatic shift in style for the Democratic Party compared to that of outgoing President Joe Biden, offering a bridge to undecided and independent voters, whose support for Biden was wavering. The key question is: Can Harris secure the necessary support to swing the general election to the Democrats?
Through early August, 2024 is behaving true to form. The seismic electoral shifts we had anticipated in January for the EU have occurred right on schedule, and global markets have been volatile. It is the U.S. election, however, that continues to throw off the biggest shocks and upsets, not all of them surprising to this newsletter. Fasten your seatbelts. More turbulence is just ahead.
In a more normal time and a more normal country, Joe Biden would be coasting to reelection despite the fact of his advanced age. But America is no longer a normal country, and Donald Trump possesses critical advantages and Biden key weaknesses that are shifting the momentum of the election inexorably toward a Trump victory.
President Biden's popular standing is far weaker than it should be after a mostly good 2023, economically and socially, and a successful first term. The chances of an election loss to Donald Trump have increased, but the situation remains salvageable for the Dems.
The recent surge of AI-generated deepfake content has sparked profound ethical debates. This post aims to dissect the intricate web of ethical dilemmas surrounding deepfakes, delving into their potential consequences.
In 1968, Soviet dissident and world renowned physicist Andrei Sakharov advocated for a gradual convergence of the US and Soviet economies, and an end to the Cold War. His essay became widely known as the 'convergence essay'. What has happened in the years that followed is much stranger: a growing convergence of US and Russian political technologies and styles that Sakharov would have found most ominous.
America's two party system has distorted social reality for decades, providing a set of binary, zero sum choices that distorts the range of options available to political actors. It's time to scrap the old two-party system and replace it with a multi-party system.
An innate human hunger for fancy and diversion is generating vast quantities of digital and real-world entertainment focused on the the trivial, the strange and the fantastic. From online avatars to cosplay, a diet of illusion marked by consumption of opinion over facts, fantasy over reality and images over words provides emotional sustenance for millions of Americans.
Nikki Haley's chance of securing the 2024 GOP presidential nomination was always going to be a long shot. If she somehow prevails against all odds, it will be because female voters now hold the balance of power in U.S. elections.
2024 is going to be a rollercoaster of a year. We predict that Donald Trump will lose the 2024 U.S. presidential election and that China will not invade Taiwan. We're more confident of the second prediction than the first. It's going to be a nail-biter. But don't believe the polls...
On Jan. 1, 2023, this site made five bold predictions for 2023. All five have come to pass. China's economy has badly underperformed expectations, Donald Trump's legal woes have not generated major unrest. Read the full article to learn how the last three shook out, and how we were all 'slaves to the grind' in 2023.
The Israeli-Hamas War now entering its seventh week is quickly evolving into human warfare reduced to its most primordial: an elemental contest of wills between two combatants, in which only one can claim victory and the other is likely to perish.
A quarter century of national disasters and global upheaval has both the U.S. and the wider world on edge. The prevailing mood is a kind of fatalism, lately made worse by the Israel-Hamas conflict. It might behoove us to take a step back to acknowledge that not all recent trends have been bad. The forces of darkness (e.g. Putin's crew, the Iranian regime) have lately suffered some setbacks of their own. It's way too early for fatalism.
The ground has shifted under American social conservatives since 2000, with support for gay marriage and drug legalization rising. Who are they now? And where do they go from here?
It's official. American conservatism is dead. One of America's two major political parties now lacks a governing philosophy. What killed conservatism? Not Donald Trump. It was fear.
The Trump phenomenon has never been a rational one. Which is why I believe, all things considered, that Trump will be defeated by a combination of both rational and irrational forces aligned against him.
The rise of mixed-race marriages in the United States since 1980 is epochal in its social implications. Biracial marriages are accelerating the pace of social tolerance and cementing a series of new social alliances.
The looming collapse of American conservatism reflects both a failure to adapt and a failure of imagination.
Recent events such as the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and the Russian military's continued failure to take the Ukrainian town of Bakhmut have been leading me to think more broadly about the nature of failure. The strange thing about failure is that it happens to people and organizations who have long track records of success before they fail spectacularly. Greymantle believes these failures have a common cause: a failure of the imagination.
January is typically a slow month, economically-speaking. After the December holidays, consumers tend to retrench, limiting their spending and paying down credit card balances. Car sales slow, as does home-buying. With winter in full swing and mid-term breaks not arriving until March, few families with school age children take vacations in January, squeezing the tourism […]
Thanks to a mild northern hemisphere winter, natural gas and other fuel prices have dropped significantly, particularly in Europe, and a spike in European social unrest feared by many last autumn has failed to materialize, with the UK being a notable exception.
As befits the first day of a new solar year, and in keeping with our promises made one week ago, Greymantle is providing the following brief 'look ahead' to the new year 2023.The bottom line for the coming year: don't expect as much upheaval as occurred in 2022, but more a steady drip of less history-making events.
2022 will go down in history as a major turning point in world events. 2022 in Review: Annus Horribilis, Annus Mirabilis.
J.R.R. Tolkien would be most pleased with the new Amazon Prime TV series based on his books. Conservative commentators such as Ross Douthat have completely missed the mark in their criticism of the series.
President Biden is on track to be reelected in a 2024 Democratic Party landslide.
When most forecasters predicted a Democratic midterm defeat for 2022, this site called the result correctly last December.
Russia decided not to nuke Ukraine last month. Thank God! We have never been so happy to be wrong about one of our forecasts.
Amazon Prime's 'Rings of Power" series has re-written the rulebook for prestige television
The biggest and scariest event of 2022 is about to happen: the use of a battlefield nuke by Russia.
There is nothing to say that rights can't be subject to revision or repeal.
Biden's history of making misstatements comes back to haunt him.
NATO's arming of Ukraine can only be a short-term expedient. Within months or even weeks, NATO must pivot to a more sustainable strategy.
Last week. Senator Lindsey Graham essentially shouted "fire" in a crowded nuclear theatre. Let's hope Vladimir Putin wasn't listening.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine is having the opposite effect of what Mr. Putin had intended. From reinvigorating NATO to rallying Western democracies to the cause of freedom, we have one man to thank. Take a bow, Vladimir!
Here's a hint: Forget about letting Ukraine into NATO.
Radicalized voters are the biggest obstacle to a return to a more 'normal' politics, as their fringe beliefs, once mainstreamed, limit elected leaders' room for maneuver.
People have been saying that the end is nigh for 2000 years now.
'Evil' succeeds by walking the narrow line that separates the cultural sensibilities of 'blue' and 'red' America.
The 2021 off-year elections have concluded and already every Chicken Little in the US is clucking that the Democrats are in for a historic drubbing in 2022 as if it were foreordained by the gods. "It's going to be 1994 all over again!" "Get ready for a repeat of 2010!" Not so. There are several reasons why the Democrats are set to outperform.